Symantec Enterprise Vault vs. Microsoft Exchange Server Archiving
Earlier on today Symantec tweeted an article comparing archiving features offered by both Symantec Enterprise Vault and Microsoft Exchange Server. They might call it a
Great article
but I’m not sure I agree. From my point of view the article reveals nothing that isn’t known for months. Exchange 2010 is RTM for half a year already. What I really would like to see (and so are others) is a detailed comparison between both Enterprise Vault and Exchange Server. So far I’ve not been able to find such a comparison anywhere on the public internet, so let me have a shot at it myself:
| Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 | Symantec Enterprise Vault 9 | |
| Archiving Targets |
|
|
| Prerequisites |
|
|
| Integration |
|
|
| Offline Archive Support | None | Offline Vault |
| Storage |
|
|
| Legal Position |
|
|
| Migration | Easy (?)
|
Hard (?)
|
| Cost |
|
|
| Conclusion | Low end alternative for pst-files for the first time ever | If you want to archive…
|
Note: This info is preliminary. Both products are in need for E2K10 SP1 before they can be taken seriously. Enterprise Vault 9 is still in beta at the moment and will only support E2010 from SP1 onwards. Exchange Server 2010 will allow separating primary and secondary mailboxes starting with SP1. This highly anticipated Service Pack will probably be released somewhere around Q3 of this year.
Apart from that I’m convinced we’re actually seeing the trusted Microsoft strategy of entering the market with a basic feature set. They feel the temperature and then gain market share gradually. Release after release.
Whether you agree or not, or just want to contribute to the discussion; feel free to comment.